Apprentis Logo

Apprentis

Apprentis LogoAI Governance Framework

How We Keep Our AI Accurate

A published framework documenting how Apprentis maintains knowledge accuracy, governs updates, and verifies quality in a fast-changing UK apprenticeship policy environment.

Version 1.0
Published March 2026
Next review August 2026
Owner Apprentis Team

26

Knowledge items with defined update schedules

20

Standard test questions run before every deployment

48h

Maximum time from policy change to live AI update

6

Step verified pipeline from detection to deployment

01: Why This Exists

Governance is not optional when young people's futures depend on accurate guidance

Apprentis operates in a regulated, fast-changing environment. The young people who use our platform are making decisions about their futures — sometimes without anyone else to ask. That means the information our AI gives them is not a product feature. It is a duty of care. This document sets out the governance framework we have built to honour that responsibility.

Accuracy as a duty

A young person told the wrong minimum wage may not challenge their employer. Wrong information here has real consequences.

Transparency by default

We publish this framework publicly so anyone can understand how we maintain accuracy and hold us to the standard we set.

Systems, not intentions

Good intentions do not keep a knowledge base current. Defined processes, named owners, and regular verification do.

02: The Risk Nobody Talks About

The most dangerous AI failure is the one users cannot see

Most conversations about AI risk focus on what a model might do wrong intentionally. But there is a quieter risk: an AI that was accurate when built, and has since become wrong as the world changed around it. No drama. No warning. Just a confident answer that is no longer true.

Risk: Manageable

AI that does not know

Says it does not know. Directs the user to an official source. The user knows to look elsewhere. Transparent and safe.

Risk: High: Silent misinformation

AI with drifted knowledge

Gives a confident answer. The answer is wrong. The user has no reason to question it. This is the failure mode governance is designed to prevent.

Risk: Medium: At least detectable

AI citing an old year

Says it is using 2023/24 guidance. The information may be wrong but the user has a signal that something might be off. Detectable but still unacceptable.

In the UK apprenticeship space alone, more changed in 2025 than in the previous five years combined. New governing bodies, new funding rules, new qualification frameworks, new minimum wages, new apprenticeship routes. An AI built in 2024 and left unchanged would be materially wrong on multiple points by early 2026. Without governance, drift is inevitable.

03: The Knowledge Framework

Every fact the AI uses is documented, sourced, and scheduled for review

Every fact the Apprentis AI draws on is documented in our Knowledge Base Governance Framework. Each item has a confirmed current value, an official source, an update frequency, and a named owner. Nothing in the knowledge base is undated or unsourced.

High frequency

Regular Updates

Items that change on a defined schedule. Failure to update these creates legal and reputational risk.

Monthly / Quarterly / Annual review

Wage ratesFunding rulesSkills EnglandGrowth and Skills LevyNew standardsBTEC defunding
Low frequency

Stable Content

Items that rarely change. Legislative foundations, process guides, and structural content.

Annual review

Apprenticeship levelsEquality Act 2010Interview guidanceProgression routes
Active building

Gaps and New Areas

Missing knowledge identified through testing and policy monitoring. Prioritised Critical, High, Medium, and Low.

As identified and prioritised

Foundation ApprenticeshipsIoM devolved rulesAssessment reformSector pathways

Verified facts as of March 2026

The following are verified facts currently in the knowledge base, confirmed from official government sources.

AreaConfirmed PositionSourceStatus
Wages from 1 April 2026Apprentice/16 to 17: £8.00/hr. 18 to 20 post first year: £10.85/hr. 21+ NLW: £12.71/hr.gov.uk/national-minimum-wage-ratesVerified
Minimum duration from Aug 20258 months for new starts (was 12 months). 187 OTJ hours minimum floor. RPL cannot reduce below 187.DfE Funding Rules 2025/26 v3Verified
English and maths: 19+ from Feb 2025Apprentices aged 19+ at start can opt out of Functional Skills. Pass not required to complete apprenticeship.DfE Funding Rules 2025/26Verified
Level 7 funding from Jan 2026Levy funding restricted to ages 16 to 21 at start (up to 25 with EHCP or care leaver). Ages 22+ must be self funded by employer.DfE Funding Rules 2025/26 v3Verified
Foundation Apprenticeships from Aug 2025New Level 2 route. 4 sectors: Construction, Engineering and Manufacturing, Digital, Health and Social Care. Employer incentive up to £2,000.find-employer-schemes.education.gov.ukVerified
Skills England from June 2025Replaced IfATE on 2 June 2025. Moved to DWP on 16 September 2025. URL: skillsengland.education.gov.ukPM written ministerial statement Sep 2025Verified
Growth and Skills Levy from April 2026Replaces Apprenticeship Levy. Apprenticeship Units launched (1 to 16 weeks, 30 to 140 hours). Units are for ages 19 and over who are already employed only. Levy expiry 12 months (was 24). Co investment for levy exhausted rises to 25%.gov.uk / skillsengland.education.gov.ukVerified
Care leaver bursary£3,000 paid in three instalments of £1,000 at 60, 120 and 300 days. Tax free. Excluded from Universal Credit calculations.DfE Funding Rules 2025/26Verified
16 defunded apprenticeship standards from March 2026New starts immediately capped at 75% of each provider's 2024/25 delivery volume. Baseline defunding: 1 September 2026. Funding completely ceases: 17 December 2026. Standards include: Team Leader (L3), Operations Manager (L5), Chartered Manager (L6), and 13 others.gov.uk/government/news/major-employment-drive (DWP, 16 March 2026)Verified
SME full funding for 16 to 24 year olds from August 2026Non levy paying SMEs receive full government funding for apprentices aged 16 to 24. Zero co investment required for this age group. Co investment (25%) still applies for apprentices aged 25 and over at SMEs.gov.uk Growth and Skills Levy guidanceVerified

Key 2026 Policy Timeline

The UK apprenticeship system is undergoing its most significant reform in years. This timeline covers the key dates every user, employer, and provider needs to know.

January 2026

Level 7 age restriction

Levy funding for Level 7 apprenticeships restricted to ages 16 to 21 at start (up to 25 with EHCP or care leaver status). Employers of those aged 22 and over must self fund.

From 16 Mar 2026

16 standards immediately capped

New starts on 16 apprenticeship standards capped at 75% of 2024/25 volume. Providers with no previous starts: zero new starts permitted. Existing learners unaffected.

April 2026

Growth and Skills Levy launches

Replaces Apprenticeship Levy. First 7 Apprenticeship Units available (19+ and employed only). Levy expiry reduces to 12 months. Co investment for levy exhausted employers rises to 25%.

August 2026

SME full funding

Non levy SMEs receive full government funding for apprentices aged 16 to 24. Zero co investment required for this age group. DfE Funding Rules 2026/27 published.

1 Sept 2026

16 standards defunded

Funding removed from Team Leader, Operations Manager, Chartered Manager, Coaching Professional, and 12 other standards. No new starts from this date.

17 Dec 2026

Funding ceases completely

All remaining funding for the 16 axed standards ends. Providers must have completed or transferred all learners by this date.

Timeline verified 19 March 2026. Source: DWP, FE Week, gov.uk. For the latest updates always check gov.uk or skillsengland.education.gov.uk

04: The Update Pipeline

Six steps from policy change to accurate AI response

A governance document is only as good as the process that keeps it current. We have defined a six-step pipeline from policy change detected to AI giving users the correct answer. Maximum time for critical items: 48 hours.

Key architectural note: Apprentis is built on a RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) architecture. This means the knowledge store is separated from the model. Updating content does not require retraining or redeploying the model: it requires updating the knowledge store and running the test suite. This is what makes a 48-hour critical update window achievable.

1
DetectSame day as change published

Policy monitor identifies a change from official sources

Sources checked on the schedule defined in the governance framework. A written summary is sent to the KB Owner: what changed, source URL, date effective, which KB items are affected.

2
AssessWithin 24 hours of detection

KB Owner identifies affected items and drafts updated content

KB Owner reviews the change summary and identifies exactly which rows in the governance framework are affected. Confirms the change is final and not still in consultation.

3
VerifyWithin 24 hours of draft

Second reviewer checks draft against original official source

A different person from the drafter checks the content against the original official source. Signs off in writing with their name and date. No self sign off permitted.

4
UpdateWithin 4 hours of sign off

Engineer updates the knowledge store with verified content

Engineer updates the RAG knowledge store with the verified content. Every document carries a verified date as metadata so the AI can surface it.

5
TestWithin 2 hours of update

Full 20 question test suite run against staging environment

All 20 questions must return a passing answer before proceeding. Any fail returns the update to Step 2 with a documented reason.

6
DeploySame day as test pass

Deploy to production and confirm live with spot check

Engineer deploys to production and runs a spot check of the specific question related to the change. Sends a one line confirmation to the team.

05: The 20 Question Test Suite

Every update must pass all 20 questions before going live

Before any knowledge update is deployed to production, we run a standard set of 20 questions against the AI in staging. All 20 must pass. Any single fail sends the update back to Step 2 of the pipeline. There is no partial pass.

Wages4 Qs

Correct rates by age and year of apprenticeship

Duration and OTJ2 Qs

8 month minimum, 187 hour floor

English and Maths2 Qs

Opt out correctly explained for 19+

Level 7 Funding2 Qs

Age restriction from January 2026

Foundation Apprenticeships1 Qs

New Level 2 route, sectors, incentive

Governance2 Qs

Skills England, not IfATE. DWP, not DfE.

Devolved Rules1 Qs

Isle of Man is not England

Resilience3 Qs

Adversarial and currency signal tests

The currency signal test: Question 20

This is the most important test in the suite. It asks: what date was the information you just gave me last verified? The three possible outcomes:

ResultWhat the AI DoesWhy
FAILCites an academic year (e.g. 2023/24 or 2025/26)Years become stale immediately. An AI citing 2023/24 in 2026 is signalling it is out of date.
FAILGives policy facts with no date or source signal at allSilent misinformation. The user has no reason to question a confident answer.
PASSStates verified date AND acknowledges information may change AND directs user to official sourceCorrect behaviour. Transparent, helpful, and defensible.
06: Two Hard Rules

Non-negotiable. Applied to every deployment without exception.

These two rules govern how the AI communicates policy information to users. They are not guidelines. They are requirements built into the system prompt and tested in every deployment cycle.

01

The AI must never cite a funding rule academic year in conversation with users

Years like 2023/24 or 2025/26 become stale the moment a new year begins. If the knowledge base is current, there is no need to cite a year.

If you ever see this:

"The funding rules I'm sharing are based on the 2023/24 academic year guidance...": this is a P1 incident. Report it immediately via the platform.

02

The AI must always give a currency signal when providing policy information

An AI that gives policy facts with no indication of when they were verified is the most dangerous failure mode. Users have no reason to question a confident answer.

Correct AI behaviour:

"This is based on guidance verified as of March 2026. For the latest official figures, always check gov.uk or contact your training provider directly."

How to report an issue: If you see the Apprentis AI citing an academic year, giving policy facts with no date signal, or providing information that appears outdated, please report it immediately via the feedback button in the platform or email info@apprentisapp.co.uk. We treat these as priority incidents with a 48-hour resolution target.

07: Our Commitment

We will never claim our AI is perfect. We will always claim our process is rigorous.

The policy environment we operate in is too dynamic for any AI to ever be perfectly current at all times. What we can commit to is a system for staying as current as possible, a process for catching and fixing errors quickly when they occur, and the transparency to be honest when something goes wrong.

Published framework

This document is public so anyone can read it, understand it, and hold us to the standard we set for ourselves.

48 hour critical response

Critical policy changes (wages, legal rules, funding restrictions) are updated within 48 hours of publication. No exceptions.

Continuous improvement

This framework is versioned. Each version reflects what we have learned. Version 2 is already in development, informed by independent governance architecture expertise.

"A nervous 16-year-old at midnight, on their own, trying to figure out their future deserves an AI they can trust. That is who we built this for. That is the standard. It always was."

— Iyioluwa Adesan, Founder, Apprentis

08: Version History

This framework evolves as our understanding deepens

Governance is not a document you publish once. It is a living system. Each version reflects new learning, new policy changes, and improvements to our architecture and process.

International Standards Alignment: This framework is designed in alignment with ISO/IEC 42001:2023, the international standard for AI Management Systems. We do not currently hold formal certification but are actively working towards full alignment as part of our Version 2 development.

Version 1.0: Current

Content Governance Framework

Knowledge base governance document (26 items), six step update pipeline, 20 question test suite, two hard rules, update calendar through March 2027. Published March 2026.

March 2026
Version 2.0: In Development

Authority Architecture Layer

Adds architectural governance informed by independent expert input. Authority boundaries, action gate verification, accountability mapping, immutable audit trail, and board level governance protocols. Governance embedded from the first design meeting, not the last testing sprint.

Expected Q3 2026
Future

Annual Review Cycle

Full framework review each August, aligned with the DfE Funding Rules publication and the start of the new academic year. Minor updates published as policy changes warrant throughout the year.

August 2026 onwards

Download the Full Framework

The complete Apprentis AI Knowledge Accuracy and Content Governance Framework: knowledge base schedule, update pipeline, test suite, hard rules, and ISO/IEC 42001:2023 alignment mapping.

Questions about this framework? Email us or use the feedback button in the platform. We read everything.